Mesa Police
Home Police MenuCommunity Review Sessions
The Community Review Sessions hosted by this project, provided a forum during which members of the community were able to discuss and learn about updates to the use of force policies based on recommendations by the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF). The format for these sessions was an open forum whereby each of the recommendations, their corresponding policy and final decisions reached by the leadership team, were displayed on poster boards around the room. Community members were invited to view the posters, educate themselves about these updates and ask questions of the evaluators, all members of the Department, who were on hand to support the sessions.
"On behalf of the Mesa Police Department I want to thank all community members who attended our Use of Force Best Practices Community Review Sessions. The Mesa Police Department truly appreciates your participation and the feedback you provided on the industry best practices, use of force recommendations, showcased during these sessions." -- Assistant Chief Lee Rankin
Use of Force Best Practices Review Project
The Mesa Police Department deeply values our relationship with the community and our continued partnerships to strengthen public safety. We work hand-in-hand with community leaders to improve our service delivery. Our commitment to improvement is also evidenced by our work with the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), Police Assessment Resource Center (Merrick Bob), former Maricopa County Attorney Rick Romley, the Department of Justice (DOJ), Community Relations Service, and President Obama’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing.
Together with the community, we have been working tirelessly over the last 18 months to review all our policies related to discipline and use of force. The Use of Force Review Committee was established, consisting of 12 community members and 12 members of the police department, to meet every two weeks for nine months to evaluate industry best practice use of force recommendations from the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF). Each recommendation received an evidence-based evaluation by a member of the MPD leadership team and considered industry trends, relevant policy, training curriculum, and implementation requirements. This guidance was ultimately presented to the Chief of Police and Assistant Chiefs for approval. As a result of this work, the following policy directions have been provided:
- Implementation of concurrent investigations that ensure incidents involving force are promptly reviewed for legal, policy, and training issues.
- The creation of the Critical Incident Review Board (CIRB) consisting of representation from the Labor Association(s), Advanced Training, a Legal Advisor, and three City of Mesa residents who serve as civilian members. The CIRB seeks to promote trust and legitimacy by fostering transparency in department actions, striving to improve police services, and helping hold the agency and its members accountable.
- Provide an educational Critical Incident Community Briefing.
- Prohibit shooting at or from a moving vehicle.
- Prohibit strikes to the face, head, or neck other than when a suspect engages in active aggression or aggravated active aggression.
- Prohibit the Carotid Control Technique except for when deadly force Is justified.
- Require officers intervene when they observe objectively unreasonable force.
- Emphasize that the policy of the Mesa Police Department is to value and preserve human life in all situations.
The examples listed above are just a fraction of the work that our department and community have accomplished together. We invite you to review each recommendation below, which includes the accompanying collaborative efforts from the committee, and the final guidance presented to the Chiefs, which are currently being implemented by the department.
Community Feedback Welcome!
Send your feedback to PDUFProjectFeedback@mesaaz.gov. Include the title of the Recommendation or Guidance presentation(s), along with your thoughts. Your feedback will be shared with the evaluators.
Use of Force Review: The Path to Implementing Best Practices
A comparative analysis of Departmental Use of Force Policies, Training
and Operational Protocols measured against recommended best practices.
Committee Review Meetings
September 11, 2019
Recommendation | Guidance | Decision |
Concurrent Investigations | Recommendation 1 | Approved |
Notifications | Recommendation 2 | Approved |
September 25, 2019
Recommendation | Guidance | Decision |
Scene Response | Recommendation 3 | Approved |
Scene Responsibility | Recommendation 4 | Approved |
Category 2 Incidents | Recommendation 8 | Approved |
Less-Lethal Shotguns | Recommendation 37 | Approved |
October 9, 2019
Recommendation | Guidance | Decision |
Executive Debrief | Recommendation 5 | Approved |
Administrative Investigations | Recommendation 6 | Approved |
Electronic Control Weapon | Recommendation 33 |
Approved |
Vehicle Pursuits | Recommendation 42 |
Approved |
October 23, 2019
Recommendation | ||
Use of Force Review Board | Recommendation 7 | Approved |
Shooting At or From Vehicles | Recommendation 21 & 32 | Approved |
Neck Restraint | Recommendation 26 |
Approved |
November 6, 2019
Recommendation | Guidance | Decision |
Supervisor Scene Response | Recommendation 22 & 39 | Approved |
Mark Electronic Control Weapon | Recommendation 36 | Approved |
Blue Team Reports | Recommendation 40 |
Approved |
November 20, 2019
Recommendation | Guidance | Decision |
Persons Exposed to Taser Receive Medical Eval | Recommendation 28 | Approved |
Report When Taser is Pointed | Recommendation 29 | Approved |
Revise Drive Stun Definition | Recommendation 34 | Approved |
Revise Taser Deployment Procedures | Recommendation 35 | Approved |
December 4, 2019
Recommendation | Guidance | Decision |
Release Use of Force Data Annually | Recommendation 62 | Approved |
Relocate Office for Professional Standards | Recommendation 54 | Approved |
Repository for Training Records | Recommendation 38 |
Approved |
Track Trends and Emerging Issues | Recommendation 58 | Approved |
December 18, 2019
Recommendation | Guidance | Decision |
Remove Warning on Making False Complaints | Recommendation 49 | Approved |
Update Definition of Deescalation | Recommendation 45 & 16 | Approved |
Update Policy for Leg Restraints | Recommendation 66 |
Approved |
Update Website Access to Compliment Form | Recommendation 48 | Approved |
January 15, 2020
Recommendation | Guidance | Decision |
Define Basis for Using Force | Recommendation 27 |
Approved |
Revive Use of Force Terms | Recommendation 24 & 14 |
Approved |
Authorized Face, Neck and Head Strikes | Recommendation 23 |
Approved |
Define Limited Strikes and Strikes | Recommendation 25 |
Approved |
January 29, 2020
Recommendation | Guidance | Decision |
Consolidate Use of Force Policies | Recommendation 11 | Approved |
Duty to Intervene | Recommendation 17 & 19 | Approved with Update |
Sanctity of Life | Recommendation 18 | Approved with Update |
Use of Force Report Findings | Recommendation 41 | Approved |
February 12, 2020
Recommendation | Guidance | Decision |
Professional Standards to Provide Findings | Recommendation 12 |
Approved |
Replace Suppression Fire with Directed Fire | Recommendation 44 & 31 |
Approved |
Reportable Use of Force | Recommendation 9 |
Approved |
Policy & Procedure Access to Public on Website | Recommendation 61 | Approved |
Authorization to Use Firearm to Stop Fleeing Felon | Recommendation 30 | Approved |
February 26, 2020
Recommendation | Guidance | Decision |
Disciplinary History Retention Period | Recommendation 10 & 53 | Approved with Update |
Consider Past Disciplinary History | Recommendation 13 | Approved |
Allow Feedback During Policy Creation | Recommendation 59 | Approved with Update |
March 11, 2020
Recommendation | Guidance | Decision |
Commending De-escalation Techniques | Recommendation 65 | Approved |
Precision Immobilization Technique (PIT) | Recommendation 43 | Approved |
Squad Assignment Bidding Process | Recommendation 64 | Approved |
Supervisor Accountability for Directed Training | Recommendation 47 & 57 | Approved |
April 30, 2020
Recommendation | Guidance | Decision |
Instructor Evaluation | Recommendation 55 | Approved |
Complaints Given a Formal Investigation | Recommendation 51 | Approved |
Complaints Are Not Discouraged | Recommendation 52 | Approved |
Website is Consistent and Accurate | Recommendation 50 | Approved |